Judges: Jim Smith Attorney General
Filed Date: 6/13/1984
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/5/2016
Dr. Elton J. Gissendanner Executive Director Department of Natural Resources Marjory Stoneman Douglas Building 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32303
Dear Dr. Gissendanner:
This is in response to your request for clarification of AGO 83-23 which posed the following question:
IS THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES LEGALLY LIABLE FOR THE PAYMENT OF AD VALOREM TAXES ASSESSED BY DRAINAGE DISTRICTS AND WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICTS PURSUANT TO CHAPTERS 298 AND 373, FLORIDA STATUTES, RESPECTIVELY?
You are seeking clarification as to whether the conclusion reached therein applies to special assessments as well as to ad valorem taxes. This opinion addresses that issue as well as the issue of the application of subsection (5) of s
Chapter 67-2236, Laws of Florida, contained a provision, now codified as subsection (5) of s
It is the specific intent of the Legislature that this act repeal any provision of state law which may require the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund to pay taxes or assessments of any kind to any state or local public agency on lands which are transferred or conveyed to the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund under the terms of this act and which at the time of the passage of this act are entitled to tax-exempt status under the constitution or laws of the state.
This provision was part of an act relating to the trustees of the internal improvement trust fund which increased the number of trustees, redefined their powers and duties, and required the transfer of the title of certain lands to the trustees. See, title to Ch. 67-2236. See also, Ch. 67-269, Laws of Florida. Another provision of Ch. 67-2236, now subsection (4) of s
It is the intent of the Legislature that where title to any lands is in the State of Florida, with no specific agency authorized by the Legislature to convey or otherwise dispose of such lands, the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund shall be vested with such title and shall hereafter be authorized to exercise over such lands such authority as may be provided by law.
And subsection (6) of s
Commencing September 1, 1967, all land held in the name of the state or any of its boards, departments, agencies, or commissions shall be deemed to be vested in the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund for the use and benefit of the state. By October 1, 1967, any board, commission, department, or agency holding title to any state lands used for public purpose shall execute all instruments necessary to transfer such title to the said Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund for the use and benefit of the state, except lands which reverted to the state under the provisions of chapter 18296, Laws of Florida, 1937, commonly known and referred to as the "Murphy Act."
When these provisions are read and interpreted together, it appears that the language of subsection (5) of s
This opinion, following the format of AGO 83-23, will apply this distinction to three categories of water management and drainage districts constituted in Florida. The categories are: water management districts created pursuant to, and operating under the authority of, Ch.
In AGO 83-23 this office concluded that "state-owned lands title to which is vested in the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund are not subject to ad valorem taxes assessed by the five water management districts created by s
The authority that Ch. 373 water management districts historically had to tax state-owned land under authority of Ch. 373 was contained in s
There shall be excluded from district taxes all bodies of navigable water and unreclaimed water areas meandered by the public surveys, all rights-of-way of said district, all areas devoted or dedicated to the use of and for the works of the district, rights-of-way of state and county highways, and streets within the limits of incorporated towns, and property owned by a public agency open to the use of the public or for the public benefit not leased to or operated by a private agency.
See, subsection (1) of s
The second category of districts is water control districts operating under the authority of Ch.
The benefits, and all lands in said district belonging to the state, shall be assessed to, and the taxes thereon shall be paid by, the state out of funds on hand, or which may hereafter be obtained, derived from the sale of lands belonging to the state. This provision shall apply to all taxes in any district including maintenance and ad valorem taxes, either levied under this or any other law, and to taxes assessed for preliminary work and expenses, as provided in s. 298.29, as well as to the taxes provided for in this section.
The issue involved is the application of the "repeal" language contained in subsection (5) of s
Thus, the three taxing authorities listed in AGO 83-23, the East Beach Water Control District, the Lake Worth Drainage District, and the South Shore Drainage District operating under the authority of Ch.
Finally, applying this construction to the South Florida Conservancy District which operates pursuant to the grant of authority contained in Ch. 17258, 1935, Laws of Florida, as amended, it is my opinion that this district continues to have the power to tax or impose assessments on state-owned lands held by the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund except as to any lands that may have been transferred to the Board under the terms of Ch. 67-2236 that at the time of such transfer were entitled to tax exempt status under the Constitution or laws of the state.
Section 5 of Ch. 20477, 1941, Laws of Florida, amended the substantively similar language of section 6 of Ch. 17258, 1941, Laws of Florida, in pertinent part, to provide: "That the lands within said District held by the Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund of the State of Florida shall be subject to the taxes levied by or pursuant to the provisions of this Act, and said Trustees, in furtherance of the trust upon which said lands are held, are hereby authorized and directed to pay the same out of any moneys in their hands derived from the sale of lands, or otherwise." Section 7 of Ch. 20477, 1941, Laws of Florida, amended the substantively similar language of section 9 of Ch. 17258, 1935, Laws of Florida to read: "That all taxes levied hereunder are hereby declared and shall be considered and construed to be special drainage assessments for benefits to said lands, and the proceeds thereof are to be used for the purposes herein specified and authorized." (e.s.) The South Florida Conservancy District additionally is authorized to exercise the taxing power granted by s
According to the supplemental materials recently furnished this office, all state lands held by the Board of Trustees within the South Florida Conservancy District were originally acquired by the state in 1903. If this is in fact the case, then all lands held by the Board of Trustees within the South Florida Conservancy District would remain subject to the taxes authorized by Ch. 17258, 1935, Laws of Florida, as amended, however denominated, except as to any lands that may have been transferred to the Board of Trustees under the terms of Ch. 67-2236 that at the time of such transfer were entitled to tax-exempt status. In making a determination as to whether state-owned lands title to which is vested in the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund are subject to ad valorem taxes or special assessments, it is necessary to initially ascertain if any such lands were transferred or conveyed to the Board of Trustees under the terms of Ch. 67-2236 and, if so, whether such transferred lands were entitled to tax-exempt status under either the Constitution or laws of the state. This office cannot make such factual determinations which must be made by the Board of Trustees and its staff. See, s
In summary, it is my opinion that the five water management districts created by and operating under Ch.
Sincerely,
Jim Smith Attorney General
Prepared by:
Craig Willis Assistant Attorney General
Mann v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company , 300 So. 2d 666 ( 1974 )
Park-N-Shop, Inc. v. Sparkman , 99 So. 2d 571 ( 1957 )
State v. Dunmann , 427 So. 2d 166 ( 1983 )
Dickinson v. City of Tallahassee , 325 So. 2d 1 ( 1975 )
Oldham v. Rooks , 361 So. 2d 140 ( 1978 )
State Ex Rel. Charlotte County v. Alford , 107 So. 2d 27 ( 1958 )
State Ex Rel. Sch. Bd. of Martin Cty. v. Dept. of Ed. , 317 So. 2d 68 ( 1975 )
Town of Indian River Shores v. Richey , 1977 Fla. LEXIS 3971 ( 1977 )