Citation Numbers: 8 Fla. Supp. 166
Judges: Milledge
Filed Date: 11/9/1955
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023
This case was heard on appeal from an order of county judge W. F. Blanton of June 15, 1955 denying the petition of Mildred H. Davis for the revocation of letters of administration, c. t. a., for the estate of Amy Hummel Sawtelle, deceased.
The county judge’s order appointing Mr. Achor and his refusal to revoke the appointment were valid unless there is a statute on controvertion. Mrs. Davis claims that section 732.44, Florida Statutes 1953, is such a statute. It seems quite clear that this section applies only to situations of intestacy. The section says this, not once but a number of times. The statute says, in effect, that where the decedent has not designated the objects of his bounty, the law prescribes who these objects shall be and the preference in administering the estate shall come from this group.
There is no statute which prescribes whom the county judge must prefer in designating a person to execute the testator’s testa
Affirmed, with costs taxed to the appellee.