DocketNumber: No. 77-15821
Citation Numbers: 46 Fla. Supp. 162
Judges: Friedman
Filed Date: 10/3/1977
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023
Petitioner was suspended for four days from his position as an alcohol test technician with the Dade County Department of Public Safety for violation of Article VIII, Section 7, Dade County Personnel Rules —
“Cause for dismissal, demotion or suspension: The following are declared to be cause for dismissal, demotion or suspension of an employee without pay though charges may be based on causes other than those enumerated:
* * * «•
“(I) That the employee has been guilty of conduct unbecoming an employee of the county whether on or off duty.”
Petitioner demanded and received a personnel hearing to review his suspension. At the hearing, petitioner accepted the facts as set forth in the department’s letter of suspension. His sole basis for appeal was that the above personnel rule under which he was suspended was unconstitutionally vague. The hearing examiner found the facts as set forth in the suspension letter and recommended that petitioner be suspended. Based upon this report and recommendation, the county manager upheld the petitioner’s suspension.-
The court further finds and determines that the personnel hearing provided the petitioner conformed to the essential requirements of law. Accordingly, the action of the 'county manager in upholding the petitioner’s suspension be and the same is hereby upheld.
Petitioner has challenged the constitutionality of Chapter VIII, Section 7(1) of the Dade County Personnel Rules quoted above as being unconstitutionally vague. The court finds, however, that the weight of authority in this country is against the position advocated by the petitioner. Therefore, this court finds and determines that Chapter VIII, Section 7(1) of the Dade County Personnel Rules is valid and constitutional.
It is accordingly, ordered and adjudged that — (1) The petition for writ of certiorari be and the same is hereby denied without prejudice. (2) The petitioner’s suspension be and the same is hereby upheld.