DocketNumber： No. 3D10-2360
Citation Numbers： 78 So. 3d 17
Judges： Cortinas, Fernandez, Ramirez
Filed Date： 10/26/2011
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 8/26/2021
Affirmed. Given that the standard of review for a motion for continuance is abuse of discretion, see Cargile-Schrage v. Schrage, 908 So.2d 528, 529 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (“[N]o judge in his right mind would have denied the continuance.”), it certainly was not an abuse of discretion for the trial court to deny a continuance in a case that had been pending for ten years.