DocketNumber： 74-1547
Citation Numbers： 308 So. 2d 600
Judges： Barkdull, C.J., and Pearson and Nathan
Filed Date： 2/19/1975
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 3/3/2016
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender and Steven Rappaport, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before BARKDULL, C.J., and PEARSON and NATHAN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
It appearing that the appellant is unable to secure a transcript of the trial testimony from the official court reporter, and that counsel for the respective parties have indicated that after diligent effort they are unable to reconstruct the record, which fact is attested to by the trial judge, it is therefore
Ordered and adjudged that the final judgment of conviction and sentence here under review be and the same is hereby set aside, and the appellant is remanded to the trial court for the purposes of being accorded a new trial. See: Simmons v. State, Fla.App. 1967, 200 So. 2d 619; Yancey v. State, Fla.App. 1972, 267 So. 2d 836; Fernandez v. State, Fla.App. 1974, 292 So. 2d 410; Dismukes v. State, Fla.App. 1974, 299 So. 2d 133.
Henley v. City of Cape Coral , 292 So. 2d 410 ( 1974 )
Rosenwasser v. Smith , 308 So. 2d 600 ( 1975 )
Simmons v. State , 200 So. 2d 619 ( 1967 )
Fairell v. State , 662 So. 2d 428 ( 1995 )
Chisholm v. Chisholm , 538 So. 2d 961 ( 1989 )
AB v. State , 816 So. 2d 1269 ( 2002 )
Ariko v. Nicholson , 606 So. 2d 435 ( 1992 )
Blasco v. State , 680 So. 2d 1052 ( 1996 )
Rosenwasser v. Smith , 308 So. 2d 600 ( 1975 )
Vargas v. State , 902 So. 2d 166 ( 2004 )