Alfred Washington v. Thelma S. Washington

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
ALFRED WASHINGTON, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
v. CASE NO. 1D14-2081
THELMA S. WASHINGTON,
Appellee.
_____________________________/
Opinion filed May 1, 2015.
An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.
Nina Ashenafi Richardson, Judge.
Fred H. Flowers of Flowers Law, LLC, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Thelma S. Washington, pro se, Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Alfred Washington, seeks review of an order denying his motion
to dissolve an injunction against repeat violence that was entered against him in
2011. In both the motion at issue and a prior motion to dissolve the injunction that
was also denied, Appellant challenged the merits of the injunction instead of making
any allegations of changed circumstances. On appeal, Appellant again challenges
the merits of the injunction. We affirm. See Highway 46 Holdings, LLC v. Myers,
114 So. 3d 215, 221 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) (noting that the appellant appealed from
an order refusing to dissolve a temporary injunction and explaining that because
neither party filed an appeal from the original injunction order entered after notice
and a hearing, “the sufficiency of the original, unappealed injunction order is not
before this Court for review”); see also Spaulding v. Shane, 150 So. 3d 852, 853
(Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (explaining that in order to establish entitlement to dissolution
of an injunction, the movant must prove that there has been a change in
circumstances since the injunction was entered).
AFFIRMED.
LEWIS, C.J., BENTON and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
2