DocketNumber: 82-12
Citation Numbers: 414 So. 2d 1178, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20265
Judges: Sharp
Filed Date: 6/9/1982
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 3/3/2016
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
*1179 Gordon H. Harris and Herbert M. Hill, of Gray, Harris & Robinson, P.A., Orlando, for appellants.
Edmund T. Woolfolk and Cameron H. Linton, of Woolfolk, Estes & Palmour, P.A., Orlando, for appellee.
SHARP, Judge.
Robert Russell and Russell Florida Lands, Inc., appeal the lower court's non-final order granting appellee's motion for a temporary injunction. The essential elements which must be proved before a preliminary injunction can be issued are a legal right in the subject matter of the suit, likelihood of irreparable harm because of the unavailability of an adequate remedy at law and a substantial likelihood of success on the merits. Oxford International Bank and Trust, Ltd. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 374 So.2d 54 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). Since none of these elements were established by the testimony or record in this case, there was no foundation upon which to ground a preliminary injunction. Accordingly, it is
REVERSED.
COBB and COWART, JJ., concur.
Jacksonville v. NAEGELE OUTDOOR ADV. , 634 So. 2d 750 ( 1994 )
Langford v. Rotech Oxygen & Med. Equip., Inc. , 541 So. 2d 1267 ( 1989 )
Cr v. E. ____ , 573 So. 2d 1088 ( 1991 )
Torok v. BLUE SKIES MOBILE HOME OA , 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1003 ( 1985 )
Heavener, Ogier Services, Inc. v. RW Fla. Region , 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20772 ( 1982 )
Hall v. City of Orlando , 555 So. 2d 963 ( 1990 )
Supal v. Pelot , 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1353 ( 1985 )
Schwadel v. Uchitel , 455 So. 2d 401 ( 1984 )