Harborside Suites v. Rosen

Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed November 21, 2018.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D18-293
Lower Tribunal No. 12-41555
________________
Harborside Suites, LLC,
Appellant,
vs.
Michael Rosen, et al.,
Appellees.
An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade
County, Rodney Smith, Judge.
The Lehman Law Firm, PLLC, and Gary E. Lehman; Nelson Mullins Broad
and Cassel, Beverly A. Pohl and Barbara Viota-Sawisch (Fort Lauderdale), for
appellant.
Gunster, Angel A. Cortiñas and Jonathan H. Kaskel; Akerman LLP, Michael
B. Chavies and Naim S. Surgeon, for appellees.
Before SUAREZ, LAGOA and FERNANDEZ, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Harborside Suites, LLC, appeals the trial court order dissolving writs of
garnishment after the trial court’s non-evidentiary hearing on the allegation of
appellee debtor, Michael Rosen, as well as that of third parties, claiming that the
garnished funds belong to someone other than the debtor. We reverse and remand
for trial, on the authority of Merriman Investments, LLC v. Ujowundu, 123 So. 3d
1191, 1193 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013):
Once issued, the trial court may consider a request to
dissolve the writ under certain circumstances. Depending
on the circumstance, the request to dissolve may be made
in either of two ways: (1) on motion of the debtor
challenging the truth of the allegations in the creditor's
petition for the writ, see § 77.07, Fla. Stat. (2001); or (2)
on an affidavit of a third party claiming the garnished
property belongs to the third party and not the debtor. See
§ 77.16, Fla. Stat. (2001). Either method requires a trial
of the issues. §§ 77.07, 77.16.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
2