DocketNumber: 86-926
Citation Numbers: 495 So. 2d 837, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2127
Judges: Nesbitt, Baskin and Daniel S. Pearson
Filed Date: 10/7/1986
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 3/3/2016
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
*838 Marc Hauser, Bay Harbor, for appellant.
Max A. Goldfarb, Miami, for appellee.
Before NESBITT, BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
The failure of the plaintiff to follow an obvious lead to the defendant's whereabouts, that is, to make inquiry of the defendant's known attorney, compels us to conclude, unlike the trial court, that the plaintiff did not exercise due diligence in attempting to locate the defendant and was thus not entitled to assert that the defendant was concealing her whereabouts or was no longer a resident of Florida so as to trigger the operation of the "substituted service on non-resident motor vehicle owner" statute, Section 48.171, Florida Statutes (1985). Knabb v. Morris, 492 So.2d 839 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986). Accordingly, the order denying the defendant's motion to set aside the default judgment and the final judgment are reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
Reversed and remanded.
Hanna v. Millbyer , 570 So. 2d 1087 ( 1990 )
Dor Cha, Inc. v. Hollingsworth , 876 So. 2d 678 ( 2004 )
Wolfe v. Stevens , 965 So. 2d 1257 ( 2007 )
Dubois v. Butler Ex Rel. Butler , 901 So. 2d 1029 ( 2005 )
Levenson v. McCarty , 877 So. 2d 818 ( 2004 )
818 Asset Management, Inc. v. Neiman , 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16084 ( 2009 )