ANTOINE FREEMAN v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed July 20, 2022.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D21-1149
Lower Tribunal No. 16-363 A-K
________________
Antoine Freeman,
Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida,
Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Mark Wilson,
Judge.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Maria E. Lauredo, Chief
Assistant Public Defender and Deborah Prager, Assistant Public Defender,
for appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Michael W. Mervine, Chief
Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before LINDSEY, MILLER and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Schmidt v. State, 310 So. 3d 135, 137 (Fla. 1st DCA
2020) (“The statute [section 948.06(2)(f)1.c.] thus limits the probationers
eligible for sentencing under the statute to probationers with only one
technical violation. And so, we conclude that the plain language of the
statute conveys a clear and definite meaning to exclude from its applications
probationers who have more than one low-risk technical violation.”).
2