NAYELI HERNANDEZ v. JOVAN HERNANDEZ

Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed January 4, 2023.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D21-2130
Lower Tribunal No. 18-18208
________________
Nayeli Hernandez,
Appellant,
vs.
Jovan Hernandez,
Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Marcia Del
Rey, Judge.
Abramowitz and Associates, and Evan L. Abramowitz, for appellant.
Davis Smith & Jean, LLC, Laura Davis Smith and Sonja A. Jean, for
appellee.
Before LOGUE, HENDON and GORDO, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Apesteguy v. Keglevich, 319 So. 3d 150, 154 (Fla. 3d DCA
2021) (“The standard of review for a child support award is abuse of
discretion.”) (quoting Castillo v. Castillo, 59 So. 3d 221, 221 (Fla. 3d DCA
2011)); Waton v. Waton, 887 So. 2d 419, 422 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (The
“findings of the trial court come to this court clothed with a presumption of
correctness and will not be disturbed absent a showing that there was no
competent evidence to sustain them.” (quoting Baker v. Baker, 394 So. 2d
465, 468 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981))); Saario v. Tiller, 333 So. 3d 315, 321 (Fla.
5th DCA 2022) (“A trial court’s decision on whether to impute income is
reviewed for an abuse of discretion, while its determination of the amount of
income to impute will be affirmed if supported by competent substantial
evidence.”) (emphasis in original); Viscito v. Viscito, 214 So. 3d 736, 737
(Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (“The standard of review of a trial court’s determination
of equitable distribution is abuse of discretion.” (quoting Bardowell v.
Bardowell, 975 So. 2d 628, 629 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008))); Taylor v. Mazda
Motor of Am., Inc., 934 So. 2d 518, 520 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (“The standard
of review for the denial of a motion for continuance is abuse of discretion.
An appellate court will not interfere with a trial judge’s discretion unless
abuse is clearly shown.”) (internal citation omitted).
2