Hinton v. State

PER CURIAM.

Appellant urges reversal on the ground that it was reversible error for the prosecuting attorney to elicit, over objection on cross-examination of the defendant, that defendant had been convicted of a felony.

We have reviewed the record and considered the point in the light of the holding in Collins v. State, 155 Fla. 141, 19 So.2d 718 (1944) and have concluded that no reversible error has been made to appear.

.Affirmed.