State v. Alexander

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

The above disposition of this appeal is not to be interpreted as ruling out the admissibility of a subsequent, independent identification by the same witnesses. See Hamrick v. Wainwright, 5th Cir. 1972, 465 F.2d 940, and Commonwealth v. Richards, Pa.1974, 327 A.2d 63.

HOBSON, A. C. J., and BOARDMAN and GRIMES, JJ., concur.