Rich v. Babcock Co.

PER CURIAM.

Because factual issues exist as to the nature and extent of the responsibility of appellee, Edward Saunders, for the alleged inadequate clothing worn by the appellant at the time he was injured by hot tar, we believe the trial court erred in entering summary judgment for Saunders. Accordingly, this cause is reversed and remanded for further proceedings in accord herewith.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.