Mathis v. State

PER CURIAM.

We interpret the order appealed to be a ruling on the motion for post-conviction relief, and we agree with appellant and appellee that the trial court did not have jurisdiction to rule on the motion due to the pendency of the direct appeal of the judgment and sentence. Therefore, the order entered by the trial court on April 24, 1984, is quashed.

SHIVERS, WENTWORTH and NIM-MONS, JJ., concur.