Karter v. Karter

PER CURIAM.

Holding that the record supports a determination by the trial court that the report of the general master was clearly erroneous, we affirm. See Reichman v. Reichman, 450 So.2d 1188 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 459 So.2d 1041 (Fla.1984); Shaw v. Shaw, 369 So.2d 81 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

Affirmed.