Dedo v. State

PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises two points, neither of which we conclude to have merit, but one of which warrants discussion.

We hold that appellant waived his right to a determination of his ability to pay the restitution subsequently ordered by the trial court by failing to preserve same when entering his plea. The only issue which was preserved and remained for the trial court was the amount of restitution.

ANSTEAD and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., and OFTEDAL, RICHARD L., Associate Judge, concur.