DocketNumber： No. 89-2816
Citation Numbers： 571 So. 2d 498, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7768, 1990 WL 149761
Judges： Garrett, Glickstein, Letts
Filed Date： 10/10/1990
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 10/18/2024
We affirm in all respects except as to the attorney’s fee. Upon this issue we remand with direction that if the trial court finds a multiplier warranted, it must state the grounds upon which its decision is premised, and it must use a multiplier in the range of 1.5 to 3. See Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1985), modified, Standard Guar. Ins. Co. v. Quanstrom, 555 So.2d 828 (Fla.1990). See also Lane v. Head, 566 So.2d 508 (Fla.1990).