Dasher v. State

W. SHARP, Judge.

Dasher appeals from the summary denial of his 3.800 motion. He claims he improperly received consecutive habitual sentences for two of his crimes because the two crimes were part of a single episode. Because such a claim is factually based, we affirm the denial without prejudice to his filing of a 3.850 motion. See Massey v. State, 648 So.2d 785 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). See also Young v. State, 616 So.2d 1133 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Nowlin v. State, 639 So.2d 1050 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). Dasher’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied.

AFFIRMED.

THOMPSON, J., concurs. GRIFFIN, J., dissents without opinion.