Davis v. State

PER CURIAM.

Based on the reasoning of our recent opinion in Freeman v. State, 679 So.2d 364 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), we affirm the denial of appellant’s rule 3.850 motion but again certify to the supreme court the same question certified in Freeman:

IS STATE v. GRAY, 654 So.2d 552 (Fla.1995), RETROACTIVE?

DELL, WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur.