Branham v. State

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges an order by which his motion to correct an illegal sentence, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), was denied. We affirm because appellant did not raise a claim cognizable under 3.800(a). King v. State, 681 So.2d 1136 (Fla.1996); Davis v. State, 661 So.2d 1193 (Fla.1995); State v. Callaway, 658 So.2d 983 (Fla.1995); Baldwin v. State, 679 So.2d 1193 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).

MINER, ALLEN and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.