DocketNumber: Nos. 1D00-437, 1D00-1544
Citation Numbers: 780 So. 2d 1033, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4130, 2001 WL 310156
Judges: Kahn, Miner, Webster
Filed Date: 4/2/2001
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/18/2024
In these two consolidated appeals, we reverse the portion of the final judgment of dissolution of marriage that treats the Whisper Bay property as a marital asset. The parties agree that, contrary to the trial court’s finding, the husband never transferred title from himself to himself and the wife. Accordingly, no presumption arises that the property is a marital asset. § 61.075(5)(a)5, Fla. Stat. (1997). The undisputed evidence is that the Whisper Bay property was acquired by the husband before the marriage, and that it is a nonmarital asset. § 61.075(5)(b)l, Fla. Stat. (1997). However, based on the evidence, any “enhancement in value [or] appreciation of [the Whisper Bay property] resulting either from the efforts of either party during the marriage or from the contribution to or expenditure thereon of marital funds or other forms of marital assets” would be a marital asset. § 61.075(5)(a)2, Fla. Stat. (1997). Accordingly, on remand, the trial court is directed to treat the Whisper Bay property as a nonmarital asset, but any qualifying enhancement in value or appreciation of that property as a marital asset.
We affirm, without discussion, as to all remaining issues raised by the parties
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; and REMANDED, with directions.