Beasley v. State

PER CURIAM.

This case is an appeal from the summary denial of Appellant John Beasley’s motion to correct illegal sentence, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Beasley raised three claims in his motion, and we affirm as to claims one and three. As to claim two, this case is REVERSED and REMANDED for fur- • ther proceedings consistent with the requirements of Clay v. State, 750 So.2d 153 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).

KAHN, BROWNING, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.