DocketNumber: No. 5D02-1672
Citation Numbers: 834 So. 2d 336
Judges: Cobb, Orfinger, Sharp
Filed Date: 1/3/2003
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/30/2022
Cunningham appeals an order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission which required him to repay unemployment benefits. We affirm.
The appeals referee determined after a hearing that Cunningham was disqualified from receiving unemployment compensation benefits and that he had been overpaid. A finding was made that Cunningham fraudulently represented his claim and fraudulently obtained payment of benefits for which he was disqualified. The referee rejected Cunningham’s testimony that he did not receive wages for the services rendered during the applicable time period.
The existence of fraud vel non in a particular case is a question of fact. Haendel v. Paterno, 388 So.2d 235 (Fla.
AFFIRMED.
. Neither party in this case-complied with the rules governing transcription of the record and none has been furnished to this court.