Florida Wildlife Federation v. St. Johns County

PER CURIAM.

The appellants have not demonstrated that their business interests are “adversely affected” by the challenged order, so as to give them standing to appeal. See Melzer v. Florida Department of Community Affairs, 881 So.2d 623 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); O’Connel v. Florida Department of Community Affairs, 874 So.2d 673 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). The appeal is therefore DISMISSED.

BARFIELD and HAWKES, JJ., concur; BENTON, J., dissents.