Harper v. State

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Lane v. State, 981 So.2d 596, 597 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (“Apprendi does not apply in this case because the scoring of victim injury points ... did not result in a sentence above the prescribed statutory maximum.”); see also Card v. State, 497 So.2d 1169, 1177 (Fla.1986) (“Counsel cannot be labeled ineffective for failing to raise issues which have no merit.”).

ALLEN, DAVIS, and BENTON, JJ., concur.