Ednere Francois v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
July Term 2014
EDNERE FRANCOIS,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
No. 4D14-1558
[October 29, 2014]
Petition alleging ineffective assistance of counsel to the Circuit Court
for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Paul L. Backman,
Judge; L.T. Case No. 09-15729 CF10A.
Ednere Francois, Lauderdale Lakes, pro se.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard
Valuntas, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We grant Ednere Francois’ petition alleging ineffective assistance of
appellate counsel. Francois was convicted after jury trial of two counts of
attempted second degree murder. On direct appeal, appellate counsel
argued that the trial court committed fundamental error in giving the
standard jury instruction on attempted manslaughter, a lesser offense
only one step removed. This Court affirmed without explanation. Francois
v. State, 85 So. 3d 497 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (table).
At the time of the direct appeal, the First District Court of Appeal had
extended Montgomery v. State, 70 So. 3d 603, 608 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009),
approved, 39 So. 3d 252 (Fla. 2010), to the attempted voluntary
manslaughter jury instruction. Lamb v. State, 18 So. 3d 734, 735 (Fla. 1st
DCA 2009). We certified conflict with Lamb in Williams v. State, 40 So. 3d
72 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010), which was ultimately quashed by Williams v.
State, 123 So. 3d 23 (Fla. 2013).
Francois argues that counsel was ineffective in failing to request
certification of the conflict in his case or a citation to this Court’s decision
in Williams. We agree.
We have granted relief in similar situations. See Wimberly v. State, 39
Fla. L. Weekly D1884 (Fla. 4th DCA Sept. 3, 2014) (granting ineffective
assistance of appellate counsel petition for failure to raise Lamb and argue
the fundamental error in the jury instruction); Walden v. State, 39 Fla. L.
Weekly D2069 (Fla. 4th DCA Oct. 1, 2014) (granting habeas corpus where
conflict was not certified and no citation was provided to the conflict case).
Appellate counsel was deficient in failing to preserve Francois’ ability to
seek further review in the Florida Supreme Court. We have reversed and
ordered a new trial in a number of cases that were remanded following the
Florida Supreme Court’s decision in Williams.1 If counsel had requested
certification of the conflict, or a citation to our decision in Williams,
Francois would have obtained the same relief.
We have considered the State’s arguments in this proceeding and find
them to be without merit. As in Wimberly, although Francois argued
mistaken identity at trial, the issue of intent was disputed in this murder
trial. 39 Fla. L. Weekly at D1885. The State’s argument that trial counsel
invited the error by requesting the erroneous instruction overlooks the fact
that the defendant in Williams had also requested the instruction. 123 So.
3d at 25.
We therefore grant the petition. Because a new appeal would be
redundant, we vacate the convictions for attempted second degree murder
and remand for a new trial.
Petition granted.
STEVENSON, TAYLOR and GERBER, JJ., concur.
* * *
1 See, e.g., Rodriguez v. State, 139 So. 3d 489 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Fenster v.
State, 141 So. 3d 232 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Lopez v. State, 138 So. 3d 488 (Fla.
4th DCA 2014); Davis v. State, 138 So. 3d 489 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Sessions v.
State, 137 So. 3d 1167 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Coriolan v. State, 137 So. 3d 1080
(Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Cunningham v. State, 39 Fla. L. Weekly D451 (Fla. 4th DCA
Feb. 26, 2014); Cox v. State, 132 So. 3d 956 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Morgan v. State,
132 So. 3d 930 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Williams v. State, 121 So. 3d 634 (Fla. 4th
DCA 2013).
2
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
3