Marin v. State

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
KRYSTAL MARIN, )
)
Appellant, )
)
v. ) Case No. 2D16-1179
)
STATE OF FLORIDA, )
)
Appellee. )
)
Opinion filed November 23, 2016.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas
County; J. Thomas McGrady, Judge.
Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender,
and Maureen E. Surber, Assistant Public
Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,
Tallahassee, for Appellee.
BLACK, Judge.
In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm Krystal Marin's judgment and sentences
but remand for the trial court to correct scrivener's errors on the amended probation
1Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
revocation orders. On February 9 and 15, 2016, the trial court entered probation
revocation orders but failed to specify the conditions of probation violated. During the
pendency of this appeal, Marin filed a motion to correct sentencing error under Florida
Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2), requesting that the trial court amend the
revocation orders to reflect the conditions violated. The trial court granted Marin's
motion and directed the clerk to enter amended revocation orders reflecting that Marin
admitted to violating conditions one, three, five, seven, and eleven. While the amended
orders entered on June 15, 2016, state that Marin violated conditions three, five, seven,
and eleven, they fail to list condition one. We therefore remand for entry of corrected
revocation orders which accurately reflect the conditions of probation Marin admitted to
violating. See Margolis v. State, 148 So. 3d 532, 532 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014).
Affirmed; remanded with directions.
CRENSHAW and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
-2-