DANIEL FOX, etc. v. CITY OF AVENTURA

Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed January 6, 2021.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
Nos. 3D19-1977, 3D19-1976 and 3D19-1975
Lower Tribunal Nos. 09-70721, 10-36073 and 09-70726
________________
Daniel Fox, etc., et al.,
Appellants,
vs.
City of Aventura, et al.,
Appellees.
Appeals from non-final orders from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade
County, Abby Cynamon, Judge.
Schuler, Halvorson, Weisser, Zoeller & Overbeck, P.A., Jason D. Weisser,
and David M. Kerner (West Palm Beach); Harris Appeals, P.A., and Andrew A.
Harris (Palm Beach Gardens), for appellants.
Johnson, Anselmo, Murdoch, Burke, Piper & Hochman, P.A., E. Bruce
Johnson, and Christopher J. Stearns (Ft. Lauderdale); Weiss Serota Helfman Cole &
Bierman, P.L., Edward G. Guedes and Samuel I. Zeskind, for appellees.
Before EMAS, C.J., and FERNANDEZ, and MILLER, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Roth v. Cohen, 941 So. 2d 496, 500 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (“For
an issue to be preserved for appeal, … it ‘must be presented to the lower court and
the specific legal argument or ground to be argued on appeal must be part of that
presentation if it is to be considered preserved.’ ” (quoting Archer v. State, 613 So.
2d 446, 448 (Fla. 1993))).
2