DocketNumber： No. 63-872
Judges： Carroll, Horton, Pearson
Filed Date： 6/23/1964
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 10/19/2024
Appellants proceeded under § 55.24, Fla. Stat., F.S.A. and urge error in the refusal of the Court to appoint a receiver thereunder. An examination of the record reveals that the appellants failed to substantially comply with the requirements of this statute in that their petition was unverified and was not directed to the “circuit court sitting in chancery”. We must decline therefore to hold the trial judge in error upon a refusal to grant the relief requested.
Affirmed.