Taylor v. State

PER CURIAM.

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus because the circuit court has recently granted petitioner leave to amend his pending motion for post-conviction relief. See Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 807 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). However,, we encourage the circuit court to continue its efforts to expeditiously dispose of the motion pending below. Wilson v. State, 775 So.2d 1003 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

BENTON, CLARK, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.