Taylor v. State

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. We affirm the trial court’s denial of the motion to correct illegal sentence as it concerns the imposition of consecutive standard sentences. Smith v. State, 886 So.2d 336, 337-38 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). Our ruling is without prejudice for the Appellant to raise his double jeopardy argument in a timely-filed Rule 3.850 motion.

SAWAYA, WALLIS, and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.