RANDOLPH BAGGETT v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed May 3, 2023.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D23-129
Lower Tribunal No. F83-9397
________________
Randolph Baggett,
Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida,
Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from
the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, William Altfield, Judge.
Randolph Baggett, in proper person.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Linda Katz, Assistant Attorney
General, for appellee.
Before EMAS, SCALES and LINDSEY, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Baggett v. Inch, 349 So. 3d 298 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021);
Baggett v. State, 271 So. 3d 1241 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019); Baggett v. State,
150 So. 3d 1151 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014); State v. McBride, 848 So. 2d 287, 290-
91 (Fla. 2003) (holding that although res judicata does not prevent a
defendant from filing successive 3.800 motions raising new issues, collateral
estoppel prevents a defendant from relitigating issues previously presented
and decided). See also Franklin v. State, 258 So. 3d 1239, 1241 (Fla. 2018)
(acknowledging that in State v. Michel, 257 So. 3d 3 (Fla. 2018), the Florida
Supreme Court abrogated Atwell v. State, 197 So. 3d 1040 (Fla. 2016): “As
we held in Michel, involving a juvenile homicide offender sentenced to life
with the possibility of parole after 25 years, Florida's statutory parole process
fulfills Graham's requirement that juveniles be given a “meaningful
opportunity” to be considered for release during their natural life based upon
“normal parole factors,” [Virginia v.] LeBlanc, 137 S.Ct. [1726,] 1729 (2017),
as it includes initial and subsequent parole reviews based upon
individualized considerations before the Florida Parole Commission that are
subject to judicial review. . . .”)
2