SHAWN MCDUFFIE vs STATE OF FLORIDA

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
SHAWN MCDUFFIE,
Petitioner,
v. Case No. 5D22-776
LT Case Nos. 2006-CF-017252
2006-CF-017253
2006-CF-017254
2006-AP-35157
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent.
________________________________/
Opinion filed July 15, 2022
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus,
A Case of Original Jurisdiction.
Shawn McDuffie, Daytona Beach,
pro se.
No Appearance for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
Due to Petitioner’s apparent abuse of the legal process by his abusive,
repetitive, malicious, or frivolous pro se filings attacking his judgments and
sentences in Brevard County Circuit Court Case Numbers 2006-CF-017252,
2006-CF-017253, 2006-CF-017254, and 2006-AP-35157, this Court issued
an order directing Petitioner to show cause why he should not be prohibited
from future pro se filings. See State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999).
Having carefully considered the response and finding it fails to show cause
why sanctions should not be imposed, we conclude that Petitioner is abusing
the judicial process and should be barred from further pro se filings.
In order to conserve judicial resources, Petitioner is prohibited from
filing with this Court any further pro se filings concerning Brevard County
Circuit Court Case Numbers 2006-CF-017252, 2006-CF-017253, 2006-CF-
017254, and 2006-AP-35157. The Clerk of this Court is directed not to
accept any further pro se filings concerning the referenced cases. The Clerk
will summarily reject any future filings regarding the referenced cases unless
filed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. See Isley v. State,
652 So. 2d 409, 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (“Enough is enough.”). The Clerk
is further directed to forward a certified copy of this opinion to the appropriate
institution for consideration of disciplinary proceedings. See § 944.279(1),
Fla. Stat. (2020); Simpkins v. State, 909 So. 2d 427, 428 (Fla. 5th DCA
2005).
SANCTIONS IMPOSED.
LAMBERT, C.J., EDWARDS and TRAVER, JJ., concur.
2