ABDELILAH JABRI vs STATE OF FLORIDA

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
ABDELILAH JABRI,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D21-2317
LT Case No. 2019-CF-4120
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed June 3, 2022
Appeal from the Circuit Court
for Osceola County,
Keith A. Carsten, Judge.
Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender,
and Allison A. Havens, Assistant
Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for
Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General,
Tallahassee, and Roberts J.
Bradford, Jr., Assistant Attorney
General, Daytona Beach, for
Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Mullens v. State, 197 So. 3d 16, 25 (Fla. 2016) (“We
have indicated that authentication for the purpose of admission is a relatively
low threshold that only requires a prima facie showing that the proffered
evidence is authentic; the ultimate determination of the authenticity of the
evidence is a question for the fact-finder.” (citing Gosciminski v. State, 132
So. 3d 678, 700 (Fla. 2013))); Knight v. State, 20 So. 3d 451, 452 (Fla. 5th
DCA 2009) (providing that “[t]here is no definitive list of requirements that
must be met to authenticate an audio tape” and holding that when “[t]he victim
testified that she was a participant in the [recorded] conversation, that she
had listened to the tape before trial, that the voices on the tape were
Appellant’s and hers and that the tape fairly and accurately memorialized the
conversation . . . [n]o further predicate [for the authentication of the recording]
was necessary”).
LAMBERT, C.J., EISNAUGLE and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
2