ROBERT MOORE vs STATE OF FLORIDA

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
ROBERT MOORE,
Petitioner,
v. Case No. 5D22-229
LT Case No. 2007-CF-127
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent.
________________________________/
Opinion filed May 20, 2022
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus,
A Case of Original Jurisdiction.
Robert Moore, Crawfordville, pro se.
No Appearance for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
Due to Petitioner’s apparent abuse of the legal process by his abusive,
repetitive, malicious, or frivolous pro se filings attacking his judgment and
sentence in Citrus County Circuit Court Case Number 2007-CF-127, this
court issued an order directing Petitioner to show cause why he should not
be prohibited from future pro se filings. See State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47,
48 (Fla. 1999). Having carefully considered the response and finding it fails
to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed, we conclude that
Petitioner is abusing the judicial process and should be barred from further
pro se filings.
In order to conserve judicial resources, Petitioner is prohibited from
filing with this court any further pro se filings concerning Citrus County Circuit
Court Case No. 2007-CF-127. The Clerk of this court is directed not to
accept any further pro se filings concerning the referenced case. The Clerk
will summarily reject any future filings regarding the referenced case unless
filed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. See Isley v. State,
652 So. 2d 409, 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (“Enough is enough.”). The Clerk
is further directed to forward a certified copy of this opinion to the appropriate
institution for consideration of disciplinary proceedings. See § 944.279(1),
Fla. Stat. (2019); Simpkins v. State, 909 So. 2d 427, 428 (Fla. 5th DCA
2005).
Future Pro Se Filings PROHIBITED.
EDWARDS, EISNAUGLE and NARDELLA, JJ, concur.
2