ERIC MELENDEZ vs STATE OF FLORIDA

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
ERIC MELENDEZ,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D22-2667
LT Case No. 1992-CF-1831-A
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed May 19, 2023
Appeal from the Circuit Court
for Seminole County,
Donna Goerner, Judge.
Andrew B. Greenlee, of Andrew B.
Greenlee, P.A., Sanford, for
Appellant.
Eric Melendez, Lowell, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Due to Appellant’s apparent abuse of the legal process by his abusive,
repetitive, malicious, or frivolous pro se filings attacking his judgment and
sentence in Seminole County Circuit Court Case No. 1992-CF-1831-A, this
Court issued an order directing Appellant to show cause why he should not
be prohibited from future pro se filings. See State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47,
48 (Fla. 1999). Appellant through counsel has stipulated to being prohibited
from future filings unless represented by counsel.
In order to conserve judicial resources, Appellant is prohibited from
filing with this Court any further pro se filings concerning Seminole County
Circuit Court Case No. 1992-CF-1831-A. The Clerk of this Court is directed
not to accept any further pro se filings concerning the referenced case. The
Clerk will summarily reject any future filings regarding the referenced case
unless filed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. See Isley v.
State, 652 So. 2d 409, 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (“Enough is enough.”). The
Clerk is further directed to forward a certified copy of this opinion to the
appropriate institution for consideration of disciplinary proceedings. See §
944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2020); Simpkins v. State, 909 So. 2d 427, 428 (Fla.
5th DCA 2005).
SANCTIONS IMPOSED.
LAMBERT, C.J., EDWARDS and SOUD, JJ., concur.
2