ROGER MALOCH vs LAURA DAVIS F/K/A LAURA MALOCH

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
ROGER MALOCH,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D21-2493
LT Case No. 2007-DR-0920
LAURA DAVIS F/K/A LAURA MALOCH,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Decision filed May 12, 2023
Appeal from the Circuit Court
for St. Johns County,
Joan Anthony, Judge.
William S. Graessle, of William S.
Graessle, P.A., Jacksonville, for
Appellant.
Rebecca Bowen Creed, of Creed &
Gowdy, P.A., Jacksonville, for
Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
LAMBERT, C.J., and EDWARDS, J., concur.
EISNAUGLE, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part, with opinion.
Case No. 5D21-2493
LT Case No. 2007-DR-0920
EISNAUGLE, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part.
Former Husband argues, inter alia, that a miscalculation of alimony
appears on the face of the judgment. I agree, but I cannot discern if the
miscalculation is in the trial court’s assessment of Former Wife’s need or in
the alimony amount itself. Therefore, I would reverse for the trial court to
reconsider both calculations. See Poropat v. Poropat, 54 So. 3d 507, 508
(Fla. 5th DCA 2010) (“[W]e reverse and remand to the trial court to correct
the mathematical error which is reflected on the face of the order.” (citation
omitted)). I would otherwise affirm.
2