Judges: Lumpkin
Filed Date: 10/21/1895
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/7/2024
The requests to charge, so far as legal and pertinent, were substantially covered by the charge given, which, as a whole, fairly submitted the issues involved; the evidence warranted the verdict; the newly discovered evidence, even if there had been proper diligence to obtain it at the trial, would not probably have changed the result; and there was no error in denying a new trial. Judgment affirmed.