Judges: Simmons
Filed Date: 1/25/1900
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/7/2024
1. There was no error in refusing a motion for a con- . tinuance or one for a postponement on account of the absence of witnesses, when the evidence submitted showed that the witnesses were beyond the jurisdiction of the court, and did not show any promise on their part to attend the court.
2. While the conduct of the solicitor-general in handing to a juror the pistol with which the homicide had been committed and questioning him as to its condition was improper, yet, as no objection was made
3. There was no error in the charge of the court or the refusals to charge, or in the admission or exclusion of evidence; and the verdict was warranted by the evidence.
Judgment affirmed.