North Rome v. Hall

Lewis, J.

There being no error of law committed, and the testimony being sufficient to sustain the verdict, this court will not interfere with the discretion of the trial judge in overruling the motion for a new trial. The writ of error, being palpably without merit, must have been sued out for delay only, and damages are accordingly awarded.

Judgment affirmed, with damages.

All concurring, except Fish, J., absent.