Judges: Lumpkin
Filed Date: 2/14/1912
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/7/2024
1. While the charges complained of may not have been in all respects accurate, in the light of the evidence and of the entire charge, there was no error requiring a reversal for any reason assigned.
2. The evidehce was sufficient to support the verdict; and the presiding judge having refused to grant a new trial, this court will not reverse the judgment.
Judgment affirmed.