Cottle v. Wilkes

Hill, J.

The evidence in this ease being sufficient to authorize the judge to find that the act complained of was a public nuisance on the public highway, he did not abuse his discretion in granting an interlocutory injunction.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices' concur, except AtTcmson, J., dissenting. ' Smith & Griggs, for plaintiff in error. J. S. Bidgill and 8. F. Mitchell, contra.