Watts v. Watts

Atkinson, J.

The exception is to a judgment overruling a motion for a new trial, in an action for divorce instituted by a wife. No complaint is made of any error of law committed on the trial. Though conflicting, the evidence was sufficient to authorize a verdict for the plaintiff, and there was no error in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except George, J., absent.