DocketNumber: 35577
Citation Numbers: 245 Ga. 364
Judges: Jordan, Undercofler
Filed Date: 2/5/1980
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023
This case raises serious constitutional questions about the medical board’s subpoena power under the Fourth and Sixth Amendments to the United States Constitution. While the issues clearly merit addressing, we are unable to do so because they are now moot. This court, as a matter of policy, does not entertain moot cases. Eg.: Barr v. Jackson County, 238 Ga. 332 (232 SE2d 923) (1977)-,Nathan v. Self, 229 Ga. 622 (193 SE2d 824) (1972).
Dr. John Rogers refused to honor a subpoena of the Board of Medical Examiners seeking his records on five patients. The board did not pursue enforcement and later dropped the investigation. Meanwhile, Rogers sued the board to determine the names of the complainants against him and challenged the validity of the subpoena on the constitutional grounds. The trial court, in granting the board’s motion for summary judgment, denied relief. We affirm.
1. Dr. Rogers has no right of access to the board’s investigative file. Morton v. Skrine, 242 Ga. 844 (252 SE2d 408) (1979). The Sixth Amendment confrontation clause does not alter this fact. The investigation is closed; he has been entirely exonerated. There is no one to confront. Assuming without deciding that the right of confrontation may apply at some point in the board’s proceedings
2. The constitutional challenge to the board’s subpoena power, Code Ann. § 84-916(d), is dismissed as moot. Barr v. Jackson County, supra.
Judgment affirmed.
"7re all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right. . . to be confronted with witnesses against him .. .’’(Emphasis supplied.) Compare Hannah v. Larche, 363
Rogers v. Medical Assn. of Ga., 244 Ga. 151 (259 SE2d 85) (1979).