DocketNumber: 15650.
Citation Numbers: 41 S.E.2d 157, 201 Ga. 752
Judges: DUCKWORTH, Presiding Justice.
Filed Date: 1/8/1947
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023
1. A judgment in a habeas corpus proceeding, being reviewable, is conclusive on the question of the legality or illegality of the alleged detention (Day v. Smith,
2. The only attempt at pleading in the present instance — being a written "motion" to set aside a judgment rendered in a habeas corpus proceeding, but being without service of any copy or process or rule nisi or other appropriate order of the court — entirely failed to meet the requirements of either of the above-stated proceedings for setting aside a judgment and to call into question the validity of the judgment here. Accordingly, the court did not err in overruling the "motion."
Judgment affirmed. All the Justicesconcur.
Bell v. Hanks , 55 Ga. 274 ( 1875 )
Artope v. Barker , 74 Ga. 462 ( 1885 )
Tietjen v. Merchants' National Bank , 117 Ga. 501 ( 1903 )
Sweat v. Latimer , 119 Ga. 615 ( 1904 )
Regopoulas v. State , 116 Ga. 596 ( 1902 )
Drake v. Brown Manufacturing Co. , 121 Ga. 550 ( 1904 )
Union Compress Co. v. Leffler & Son , 122 Ga. 640 ( 1905 )
Ford v. Clark , 129 Ga. 292 ( 1907 )
Wright v. Martin , 153 Ga. 32 ( 1922 )
Simpson v. Bradley , 189 Ga. 316 ( 1939 )
Fields v. Arnall , 199 Ga. 491 ( 1945 )
Jackson v. Jackson , 199 Ga. 716 ( 1945 )
Day v. Smith , 172 Ga. 467 ( 1931 )
Methodist Episcopal Church, South Inc. v. Decell , 187 Ga. 526 ( 1939 )
Turner v. Balkcom , 219 Ga. 48 ( 1963 )
Harper v. Mayes , 208 Ga. 766 ( 1952 )
Dixon v. Dixon , 211 Ga. 869 ( 1955 )
Sanders v. McHan , 206 Ga. 155 ( 1949 )
Morris Plan Bank of Georgia v. Hadsall , 202 Ga. 52 ( 1947 )
Dupree v. Turner , 99 Ga. App. 332 ( 1959 )
United States Fidelity &C. Co. v. Dunbar , 112 Ga. App. 102 ( 1965 )