Romano v. State

297 Ga. 497FINAL COPY
S15A0534. ROMANO v. THE STATE.
HINES, Presiding Justice.
On July 18, 1997, Joseph Victor Romano pled guilty to two charges of
malice murder and was sentenced to two concurrent terms of life in prison.
Romano then moved to withdraw his guilty pleas, and this Court affirmed the
trial court’s denial of that motion. See Romano v. State, 272 Ga. 238 (527 SE2d
184) (2000).
On October 7, 2014, Romano filed in the trial court a motion for an out-
of-time appeal, which the trial court denied. As we have previously noted,
[a]n out-of-time appeal is a judicial creation that serves as the
remedy for a frustrated right of appeal. [Cit.] It is the means by
which a criminal defendant who lost his right to direct appeal of his
criminal conviction due to counsel's negligence, ignorance, or
misinterpretation of the law may gain that appellate review. [Cit.]
The denial of a motion for out-of-time appeal is directly appealable
when the criminal conviction at issue has not undergone appellate
review. [Cit.] Due to the very nature of an out-of-time appeal, it is
not a remedy available to a criminal defendant whose conviction
has been reviewed by an appellate court on direct appeal since that
defendant is not entitled to a second direct appeal from his
judgment of conviction. [Cits.] Since an out-of-time appeal is not
available to one whose conviction has been affirmed on direct
appeal, the denial of a motion for out-of-time appeal filed by such
a defendant is not subject to direct appeal to the appellate courts.
[Cit.]
Richards v. State, 275 Ga. 190, 191 (563 SE2d 856) (2002) (Punctuation and
footnote omitted.) Romano’s conviction was reviewed and affirmed on the
direct appeal of the denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty pleas, and thus
this appeal must be dismissed.1 Id. at 191-192. See also Jackson v. State, 273
Ga. 320 (540 SE2d 612) (2001).
Appeal dismissed. All the Justices concur.
1
We note that the issues Romano sought to raise by his motion for an out-of-time appeal
appear to be identical to those addressed in his direct appeal. See Romano, supra. We also note that
Romano was represented by counsel in both the trial and appellate proceedings. Compare Trauth
v. State, 295 Ga. 874 (763 SE2d 854) (2014).
2
Decided July 6, 2014.
Murder. Mitchell Superior Court. Before Judge Cato.
Joseph V. Romano, pro se.
Joseph K. Mulholland, District Attorney, Craig E. Miller, Assistant
District Attorney; Samuel S. Olens, Attorney General, Patricia B. Attaway
Burton, Deputy Attorney General, Paula K. Smith, Senior Assistant Attorney
General, for appellee.
3