Citation Numbers: 28 Ga. 121
Judges: Lumpkin
Filed Date: 3/15/1859
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/7/2024
By the Court.
delivering the opinion.
Ought the Judge to have granted, a peremptory mandamus in this ease ? The answer to this question depends .upon the legality of the tax paid by the Bank in 1855 — ’6.
The stockholders of this, and every other bank, are usually scattered over the State. Why should an extra tax be levied on their stock for the benefit of Whitfield county ? It would be more equitable to levy it on each stockholder to the amount of his shares; yet they are specifically exempted by the act of 1851-2.
This, and all other banks, pay to the State a heavy tax upon their capital; yet it is paid directly to the treasurer, without the intervention of county officers. No mode has been prescribed for levying and collecting such a tax by the county; and until the Legislature see fit to speak out plainly upon the subject, we are unwilling to sanction the exercise of so doubtful a power, to say the least of it.
Judgment reversed.