Bennett v. Bagwell & Stewart, Inc.

Candler, Justice,

dissenting. I do not agree to the judgment of reversal in this case for the reason that the evidence, as I view it, demanded a finding by the jury that the defendants had not wilfully violated any of the terms of the injunction which the contempt petition alleges they violated; and because it is a well-established principle of law that errors in the court’s,charge to the jury do not require a reversal of the case where the evidence demanded the verdict returned. See, in this connection, Lunsford v. Armour, 194 Ga. 53 (2) (20 S. E. 2d 594); Key v. Stringer, 204 Ga. 869(3) (52 S. E. 2d 305); and Atlanta Printing Specialties & Paper Products Union No. 527, AFL-CIO v. Zell, 215 Ga. 732 (113 S. E. 2d 401).