DocketNumber: 4126
Judges: Russell
Filed Date: 2/11/1913
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/7/2024
Irrespective of the question as to the admissibility of evidence which it is insisted should have been excluded upon the ground that it was obtained by illegal seizure and search of the defendant’s person, and without regard to the admissibility of -the copy of the revenue . license, the other circumstances proved in the case compel the conclusion that the defendant was guilty of a violation of the municipal ordinance. Judgment affirmed.